Insights on city communication, civic engagement, and the future of municipal technology

AI feels overhyped to some and world-changing to others. History shows real paradigm shifts often look absurd at first, then arrive slower than predicted and change everything.

When the ideal solution is also the hardest one, should we still pursue it? A reflection on progress, compromise, and the hidden cost of choosing what’s easier.

Low resident engagement isn’t apathy. It’s a communication problem. When cities consistently share useful, timely information, engagement and satisfaction follow.

Innovation is admired in hindsight, but being early is lonely, risky, and uncomfortable. A reflection on why organizations wait to lead—and what it costs when they do.

When cities rely on too many “official” channels, residents are left confused about where the truth lives. Channel fatigue undermines clarity when it matters most.
AI doesn’t feel like just another tool. It feels like a shift in how ideas are formed, raising new questions about creativity, judgment, and what remains uniquely human.
Should city communication aim to entertain or inform? A reflection on attention, trust, and where creativity fits withoutallon in helping residents get the official information they need.

How the shift from traditional search to AI is changing how residents find city information, and why speed, accuracy, and trusted sources now matter more than navigation.

A shelter-in-place order in Layton, Utah never reached our household. When critical safety updates rely on social media, residents are excluded and misinformation fills the gap.

Residents deserve clear, timely, fact-based information from their city. When official information is hard to find or fragmented, trust erodes and misinformation fills the gap.